We are migrating CKEditor issue tracking to GitHub. Please, use GitHub to report any new issues.

The former tracking system (this website) will still be available in the read-only mode. All issues reported in the past will still be available publicly and can be referenced.

Important: we decided not to transfer all the tickets to GitHub, as many of them are not reproducible anymore or simply no longer requested by the community.
If the issue you are interested in, can be still reproduced in the latest version of CKEditor, feel free to report it again on GitHub.
At the same time please note that issues reported on this website are still taken into consideration when picking up candidates for next milestones.

To report a new issue, go to https://github.com/ckeditor/ckeditor-dev/issues and follow the instructions in the issue template.

Context Navigation

← Previous Change
Ticket Comment History
Next Change →

Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #13214, comment 3

Timestamp:: May 25, 2015, 10:55:42 AM (9 years ago)
Author:: Piotr Jasiun
Comment:

Legend:

: Unmodified
: Added
: Removed
: Modified

Ticket #13214, comment 3

initial	v1
2	2	> User may copy&paste a link in the meantime and we would like to avoid having two links with the same id. This may be assured in `editor#paste` listener.
3	3
4		If user copy&paste the link, both links should be replaced with widgets imho. And I do not see the point why we should do this in 2 requests. We could ~~use classes instead of IDs and when data are loaded find all elements with this class~~ and replace them, but probably as 2 separate undo steps (or not?).
	4	If user copy&paste the link, both links should be replaced with widgets imho. And I do not see the point why we should do this in 2 requests. We could when find all elements with this ID when data are loaded and replace them, but probably as 2 separate undo steps (or not?).
5	5
6	6	In general undo and user modifications might be tricky: what if user edit something before link was replaced with widget? It should be saved as a separate undo step, I believe.