Opened 14 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
#7260 closed Bug (wontfix)
node.js -> getParents performance poor
Reported by: | campaign | Owned by: | Garry Yao |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | Performance | Version: | 3.0 |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
getParents : function( closerFirst ) { var node = this; var parents = []; do { parents[ closerFirst ? 'push' : 'unshift' ]( node ); } while ( ( node = node.getParent() ) ) return parents; },
unshift method performance poor
example code
var t = +new Date,s = [] for(var i = 0;i<1000;i++){ s.push(i) }; s.reverse(); alert(+new Date - t) // 2 var t = +new Date,s = [] for(var i = 0;i<1000;i++){ s.unshift(i) }; alert(+new Date - t) //21
in ie8
Attachments (1)
Change History (8)
comment:1 Changed 14 years ago by
Component: | General → Performance |
---|
comment:2 Changed 14 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Keywords: | HasPatch added |
comment:3 Changed 14 years ago by
Keywords: | HasPatch? added; HasPatch removed |
---|---|
Version: | 3.5.3 (SVN - trunk) → 3.0 |
comment:4 Changed 14 years ago by
Owner: | set to Garry Yao |
---|---|
Status: | new → review |
Changed 14 years ago by
Attachment: | 7260.patch added |
---|
comment:6 Changed 14 years ago by
I've created a performance test that reflects our usage of it a bit better:
http://jsperf.com/array-push-vs-unshift
It shows that we'll have no real benefits on changing our code, but the theory can still be accepted (except for Opera).
comment:7 Changed 13 years ago by
Keywords: | HasPatch? removed |
---|---|
Resolution: | → wontfix |
Status: | review → closed |
Please enclose code into
code
tags.