Opened 16 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
#2604 closed Bug (fixed)
Response.CodePage
Reported by: | Chris Sgaraglino | Owned by: | Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | FCKeditor 2.6.5 |
Component: | Server : ASP | Version: | FCKeditor 2.6.3 |
Keywords: | Confirmed Review+ | Cc: | cto@… |
Description
The addition of the Response.CodePage variable in the basexml.asp file is causing Browser failures when browsing for files.
The OS is Windows Server 2000 with SP4 using IIS.
Commenting out this line does remove the error, but the repercussion is that larger data imported into the editor will be truncated at 64.5k characters.
Attachments (1)
Change History (7)
comment:1 Changed 16 years ago by
Keywords: | Pending added; Browser CodePage removed |
---|
comment:2 Changed 16 years ago by
I'm not sure there are any steps to reproduce it? If I un-comment it on my system I get the error as soon as I try to use the browser?
Here is more information in your forums: http://www.fckeditor.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=10884&p=30763&hilit=CodePage#p30763
It is clear that there is an issue...
As for testing the amount of data allowed, here is what I did: Opened a page (all pages are stored in the SQL 2000 dB) Did a Google Search and copied the source (about 130k characters) Past it into the editor and hit save. (this saves to the dB and then reopens it in the editor)
But as I write this I am wondering if this is a SQL issue and not an editor issue?
comment:3 Changed 16 years ago by
Component: | File Browser → Server : ASP |
---|---|
Keywords: | Confirmed Review? added; Pending removed |
Owner: | set to Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo |
Status: | new → assigned |
The size of data isn't affected by that property, it must be something else in your system.
The patch just avoids ignores the error in windows 2000, so people with newer versions don't suffer any drawback.
comment:4 Changed 16 years ago by
Milestone: | → FCKeditor 2.6.5 |
---|
comment:5 Changed 16 years ago by
Keywords: | Review+ added; Review? removed |
---|
could you give us steps to reproduce this bug?